TL;DR: In the words of the great philosopher Abed Nadir, > Chaos already dominates enough of our lives. religious organization share similar beliefs, tend to cooperate with one another, and face a larger degree of cooperation from society than do non-members. Each ritual has its own unique significance within the religious tradition that generated it and allows participants to reinforce a relationship with divinity and ancestry. The universe is an endless raging sea of randomness. Our theory provides therefore a link between individual beliefs, social rituals, and social cohesion. 3. Our job isn't to fight it, but to weather it together, on the raft of life. What are some examples of these rituals in your own community? When you step into a sacred space, you can leave the profane world behind. Rituals cannot only set apart particular times as sacred, but certain spaces as well. What role do these rituals play in bringing people together? 3. Rituals and performance Chris Attwood, co-author of the book Your Hidden Riches: Unleashing the Power of Ritual to Create a Life of Meaning and Purpose , claims that rituals … 1 Introduction Religion has fascinated scientists for hundreds of years. In religious traditions, these sacred spaces are places where the veil between humans and the transcendent are thin, facilitating communication between heaven and earth. It must be emotionally satisfying. Rites of passage and rites of intensification are an important part of many religious traditions, but these same rituals also exist in secular (non-religious) contexts. 2. In order for a ritual to be fully effective it must fulfill four requirements: 1. 2. There exist abundant rituals for every occasion - so why are more and more people in this modern age seeking out rituals different from what they have? Communion, baby-naming and circumcision are religious rituals derived from Catholicism and Judaism. Working from a cultural studies perspective, I argue that such prayers, while religious rituals, are first and foremost political statements against what both groups consider injustices. It must be intellectually satisfying.