If you want to stay in the price range of the TLM 103, I A/B a Blue Blueberry against it and to me it was a more pleasing sounding mic for the following reasons. Neumann U87 Vs TLM 103 Conclusion Basically, both Neumann U87 and Neumann TLM 103 are excellent products. 1. See also: Neumann TLM 102 vs 103. However, Neumann U87 is much more versatile due to the multiple polar patterns, which has each own proximity effect, and additional low-cut filter and pre-attenuation pad. Compared to the TLM 49, it’s a more balanced sound overall and will work with a much wider range of voices and instruments. It has a transformer in it (all TLM mic's are transformerless though the U87 and ie have a transformer) which adds a … They have each own virtues. I'll be honest, for me to get a u47/u67/old u87, I'll probably have to either make it with a huge deal, win the lotto (the former is more likely), or fall into a boatload of money some other way. The bundle includes a stand mount which is quite useful and effective for eliminating mechanical noise. The midrange effortlessly cuts through dense mixes. The Peluso P-87 versus the classic Neumann Microphones. New Neumann TLM 67. It is available in two finishes, matte black and nickel. ... a U87. Neumann TLM 49 vs TLM 67. The microphone has a frequency range of 20Hz to 20kHz, features cardioid, omni and figure-of-eight polar patterns, and offers a 10dB pad and a low-cut filter. Do you wonder how does the Peluso P87 compare to the classic Neumann U87 microphone? On the other hand, Neumann U87 is quite bigger and heavier. The TLM 67 uses an electronic circuit instead of an output transformer - the TLM bit stands for Transformer-Less Microphone - and it's the same shape and size as the well-known U87. Hence, Neumann TLM 102 can be a more portable mic that is easy to handle. And to its newest offspring, the Neumann U87ai?Check out the video above, where Sound Pure pro audio expert David Barrett compares the three “87” style microphones, with the help of vocalist singer-songwriter Jason Adamo. It’s a classic for a reason — it just works for 90% of singers.