COMPANY: sE Electronics PRODUCT: sE8 WEBSITE: PRICE: $249 (single); $499 (pair) PROS: Even and smooth sonic capture, not harsh at the top end. CONS: Unable to store split cable and mic in the poorly built storage box. my guess is a is the se8. This ensures identical performance and the highest possible mic-to-mic consistency, so you can rest assured that your stereo image will be as clear & accurate as possible. I employed the pads depending on the situation. However, unlike an omnidirectional mic, the EHR-T allows you to alter the gain of the front and back separately which offers a lot of flexibiity. Pairing placement tricks with the rolloffs provided more than enough tools to get the job done. I first used the mic as a mono overhead placed in the center of two spaced overheads, then on a later session as a room mic placed six feet back from the kit. This works great when trying to blend more of the room with the kit. You need an account to post a reply. With the EHR-T, I cut both capsules to separate mono tracks in Pro Tools and then blended the direct with the off-axis signal to taste. Output cables are not marked (front/back). I’m always experimenting with slim, front-address microphones around a drum kit because they’re so easy to place. so either that's the km184 which corresponds perfectly with the graphs and actually indicates the se8 is more accurate from a frequency standpoint. My only problems with the EHR-T have nothing to do with the excellent mic, it’s the poor presentation. The mic also worked very well when recording hand percussion like tambourine, shaker and assorted noise-makers. Visit our corporate site. so either that's the km184 which corresponds perfectly with the graphs and actually indicates the se8 is more accurate from a frequency standpoint. Microphones / Miking; ... Dual pad settings, at -10dB and -20dB, are selected using a recessed slide switch and enable the mic to cope with very high SPLs, such as might be encountered when close-miking brass instruments. CONS: None. The EHR-T held up better in the mix than panning the stereo overheads both to center. At first they sound almost the same but after a couple of days my ear noticed a. Microphones are like good friends: You can’t have too many trusted ones. Published: 01/06/2018. I found that this “hybrid” effect worked the same in other applications. It also stands up great as a single-point source mono overhead without the stereo overheads if you’re trying to tuck the kit into mono. I’ve used this technique with dual-output mics in the past, most notably the Lewitt 640TS. sE Electronics sE7 Small-diaphragm Condenser Microphone - Matched Pair Small-diaphragm Cardioid Condenser Mic with 80Hz Highpass Filter, Pad, and Gold-plated XLR (pair) $199.00. The EHR-T is not new. Ok so I bought the SE8 and I own the Neumann 184. If you have $150 more to spend (or $300 for the matched pair) the big brother sE8 may be worth investigating. I used the sE8s as overheads, as a close-mic for a ride cymbal and on hi-hat, and they were reminiscent of some of the best condensers I’ve used, some much more expensive. This is not a small task with other mics, which may bring harshness, especially at hotter levels. For example, when I used it in a live chamber, I got all the accurate high-frequency cues plus the bloom of the mids and lows you’d expect from a real resonant cavity. The EHR-T has a single 5-pin XLR at its output that connects to a provided splitter cable that ports each capsule to separate 3-pin XLRs. I also played with the proximity effect to thin out the boomy-ness of the instrument; when I wanted a more intimate sound closer to the strings, I employed the 80Hz or even 160Hz rolloffs to tailor the low end to taste. The box the mic comes in is not suitable for a mic that’s priced well over $2k. It offers two low-cut filters (switchable between 80 and 160 Hz) and two attenuation pads (-10dB or -20dB). The main differences between the 7 and the 8 are shown on screen. The pair of sE8s provided an impressive stereo picture of the instrument, easily handling the transients when the instrument was played hard. really hope being wrong about this one, because A sounds a lot better imho: A is KM184, B is sE8. This third mic was panned center and overly compressed, which when blended with the two other mics added a beautiful presence to the piano in the track. A third mic, an AKG D19, was placed close to the resonant wooden bed of the piano directly beneath the third sound hole from the back of the piano. It is a thin, unfinished, foam-lined wooden box with a sliding lid that isn’t large enough to store the essential multipin splitter cable. Small-diaphragm Capacitor Microphone . It offers two low-cut filters (switchable between 80 and 160 Hz) and two attenuation pads (-10dB or -20dB). I would choose B and I would place it differently: apart from the boomy low end I prefer B overall, it seems more detailed in the mid-high and high regions to me. The EHR-T from Ehrlund uses a triangular-capsule design, a shape that seems to bring improved resonance and damping to this excellent transducer. While the EHR-T is an excellent mic and would benefit any mic locker, it falls short in presentation for a high-end transducer in this price range. Prolific mic-makers sE Electronics are attending the AES Convention in New York this week to exhibit two new products for the home recordist: an affordable small-diaphragm microphone, and an in-line phantom-powered preamp. The sE8 Matched Pair comes complete with a precision stereo mounting bar, two protective wind screens, two mic clips, and a robust high-quality metal flight case.